In re Brown
This text of 16 A.D.2d 519 (In re Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent, admitted to practice in 1934, is charged with professional misconduct in connection with his solicitation of retainers in violation of section 270-a of the Penal Law. He pleaded guilty to an attempt to commit the crime of unlawful solicitation. In addition to being charged with “ solicitation ” he is also charged with a failure to co-operate with the preliminary inquiry of the Co-ordinating Committee [520]*520on Discipline and with having commingled clients’ moneys with his own.
Respondent has no prior disciplinary history and since 1954 has conducted himself in accordance with the high standards of the profession. There is no evidence that any of his clients have been prejudiced by reason of his improper conduct. In addition, he ultimately co-operated fully with the Co-ordinating Committee and frankly disclosed his past transgressions.
Under all the circumstances the respondént should be suspended from the practice of the law for one year.
Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ., concur.
Respondent suspended for a period of one year.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A.D.2d 519, 229 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brown-nyappdiv-1962.