In re Brown

602 N.E.2d 136, 1992 Ind. LEXIS 242, 1992 WL 322982
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Ind. LEXIS 14
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 2, 1992·No. No. 49S00-8610-DI-874·Published

Opinion

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, files its "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation Upon the Petition for Reinstatement Filed by Alfred L. Brown", and unanimously recommends that the petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law upon payment all costs assessed in this and his prior disciplinary proceeding.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the Commission's recommendation should be approved and that the Petitioner should be reinstated.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Alfred L. Brown is hereby reinstated as an attorney in this state subject to his paying all assessed costs.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the parties and their attorneys, to the Indiana Board of Law Examiners, and to all parties who were previously notified of this Court's Order accepting Petitioner's resignation from the practice of law.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brown, 602 N.E.2d 136, 1992 Ind. LEXIS 242, 1992 WL 322982 (Ind. 1992).

602 N.E.2d 136 (In re Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.