In re Brown

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Brown

199 Ill. 2d 586

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 2002

DocketMR 18116

StatusPublished

This text of 199 Ill. 2d 586 (In re Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brown, 199 Ill. 2d 586 (Ill. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed. Respondent Roger L. Brown is suspended from the practice of law for 60 days and until he successfully completes the program offered by the Illinois Professional Responsibility Institute. Respondent Roger L. Brown shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed. Respondent Roger L. Brown is suspended from the practice of law for 60 days and until he successfully completes the program offered by the Illinois Professional Responsibility Institute. Respondent Roger L. Brown shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 Ill. 2d 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brown-ill-2002.