In re Brown

755 S.E.2d 742, 294 Ga. 722, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 355, 2014 WL 823414, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 174
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 2014
DocketS14Y0029, S14Y0030, S14Y0031, S14Y0032
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 755 S.E.2d 742 (In re Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Brown, 755 S.E.2d 742, 294 Ga. 722, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 355, 2014 WL 823414, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 174 (Ga. 2014).

Opinion

Per curiam.

These disciplinary matters are before the Court on four Notices of Discipline seeking the disbarment of Leah Rochelle Brown (State Bar No. 088515). The State Bar attempted to serve Brown personally at the address listed with the State Bar, but the sheriff filed a return of service non est inventus. The State Bar then properly served Brown by publication pursuant to Bar Rule 4-203.1 (b) (3) (ii). Brown failed to file a Notice of Rejection. Therefore, she is in default, has waived her rights to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to such discipline and further proceedings as may be determined by this Court. See Bar Rule 4-208.1 (b).

The facts, as deemed admitted by virtue of Brown’s default, show that Brown, who was admitted to the Bar in 1988, agreed to represent four different clients in domestic relations cases and was paid attorney fees. However, in each case, she failed to adequately communicate with the client and completely abandoned the client’s matter, to the detriment of the client. Additionally, she failed to file a sworn, written response to the Notice of Investigation issued in each matter. See Bar Rule 4-204.3.

The Investigative Panel found that by this conduct Brown violated Rules 1.2, 1.3, 1.4,1.5, 1.16, 3.2, and 9.3 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.2 and 1.3 is disbarment; the maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.4, 1.5,1.16, 3.2, and 9.3 is a public reprimand. In aggravation of discipline the Investigative Panel considered that these matters show an extensive pattern of client neglect.

Having reviewed the records, we conclude that disbarment is the appropriate sanction in these matters. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the name of Leah Rochelle Brown be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Brown is reminded of her duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Disbarred.

All the Justices concur. Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Joseph Roger Davis
860 S.E.2d 467 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2021)
In THE MATTER OF CYNTHIA ANN LAIN (Five Cases)
311 Ga. 427 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2021)
In the Matter of Christopher John Thompson
306 Ga. 618 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2019)
in the Matter of Walter Linton Moore
303 Ga. 296 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
In re Moore
811 S.E.2d 343 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
in the Matter of Leah Rochelle Brown
Supreme Court of Georgia, 2014

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
755 S.E.2d 742, 294 Ga. 722, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 355, 2014 WL 823414, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brown-ga-2014.