In Re Brown

10 A.3d 619, 2010 WL 3700182
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 242
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided September 23, 2010·No. 06-BG-550·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of this court’s April 14, 2010, order referring Bar Counsel’s request to revoke respondent’s probation to the Board on Professional Responsibility for consideration by a Hearing Committee, the subsequent report and recommendation of the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee, the statement of Bar Counsel, and the entire record, it is

ORDERED that Bar Counsel’s motion to revoke probation is granted and the probation imposed on Timothy Brown, Esquire, in this matter is hereby revoked. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Timothy Brown, Esquire, is hereby suspended from the practice of law for the period of two years and that reinstatement is subject to both a finding of fitness as well as a showing of reasonable progress towards repayment of the amounts owed to the Clients’ Security Fund. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement, this period will not commence to run, until such time as respondent files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court is grateful to the Hearing Committee for its invaluable assistance in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Brown, 10 A.3d 619, 2010 WL 3700182 (D.C. 2010).

10 A.3d 619 (In Re Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Asylum Co v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
10 A.3d 619 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)