In re Brown

633 F. App'x 188
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2162
StatusPublished

This text of 633 F. App'x 188 (In re Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Brown, 633 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Brown petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging unreasonable delay by the district court and seeking an order directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet discloses that a final order was entered on October 20, 2015, denying relief on Brown’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and his motion to alter or amend the judgment. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brown-ca4-2016.