In re Brown

Fourth Circuit

In re Brown

633 F. App'x 188

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2016·No. No. 15-2162·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Brown petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging unreasonable delay by the district court and seeking an order directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet discloses that a final order was entered on October 20, 2015, denying relief on Brown’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and his motion to alter or amend the judgment. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Brown petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging unreasonable delay by the district court and seeking an order directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet discloses that a final order was entered on October 20, 2015, denying relief on Brown’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and his motion to alter or amend the judgment. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Brown, 633 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

633 F. App'x 188 (In re Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related