In re Brown

Second Circuit

In re Brown

184 F. 454, 106 C.C.A. 536, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 3884

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 9, 1911

DocketNo. 125

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 184 F. 454 (In re Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brown, 184 F. 454, 106 C.C.A. 536, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 3884 (2d Cir. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The precise point raised here was before us in Re McIntyre, Petitions of Grace, Talbot, and Others (opinion filed August 11, 1910) 181 Fed. 960. The special master’s report on the Talbot claim will be found in 24 Am. Bankr. Rep. 20. Upon the appeal before us, attention was called to the circumstance that there was a division of opinion in the District Court; Judge Hand having decided one way in Re A. O. Brown & Co., I'll Fed. 254, and Judge Plough the other way in the case then before us. Counsel for [455]*455Talbot presented an exhaustive brief of 34 pages, citing substantially all the authorities to which we are now referred, and supporting his appeal by the same line of reasoning. We sustained Judge Hough, and see no reason for reopening the question settled by that decision.

The order is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The precise point raised here was before us in Re McIntyre, Petitions of Grace, Talbot, and Others (opinion filed August 11, 1910) 181 Fed. 960. The special master’s report on the Talbot claim will be found in 24 Am. Bankr. Rep. 20. Upon the appeal before us, attention was called to the circumstance that there was a division of opinion in the District Court; Judge Hand having decided one way in Re A. O. Brown & Co., I'll Fed. 254, and Judge Plough the other way in the case then before us. Counsel for [455]*455Talbot presented an exhaustive brief of 34 pages, citing substantially all the authorities to which we are now referred, and supporting his appeal by the same line of reasoning. We sustained Judge Hough, and see no reason for reopening the question settled by that decision.

The order is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 F. 454, 106 C.C.A. 536, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 3884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brown-ca2-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack