In re Brouner

38 A.D.2d 94, 327 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5656

This text of 38 A.D.2d 94 (In re Brouner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Brouner, 38 A.D.2d 94, 327 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Department on October 30, 1934.

On May 4,1971, respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of the crime of bribery, a felony, and was sentenced to serve a prison term.

Petitioner Association of the Bar of the City of New York by this petition seeks to have respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys. Such action is mandatory (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd. 4).

[95]*95The petition should he granted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Marks wich, Nunez and Kupferman, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.2d 94, 327 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brouner-nyappdiv-1972.