In re Broome
769 S.E.2d 675, 411 S.C. 627, 2015 S.C. LEXIS 105
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 4, 2015
DocketAppellate Case No. 2015-000400
StatusPublished
This text of 769 S.E.2d 675 (In re Broome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Broome, 769 S.E.2d 675, 411 S.C. 627, 2015 S.C. LEXIS 105 (S.C. 2015).
Opinion
ORDER
On February 11, 2015, Respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of six (6) months, retroactive to October 9, 2013. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.
The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
769 S.E.2d 675, 411 S.C. 627, 2015 S.C. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-broome-sc-2015.