In re Broome

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Broome

749 S.E.2d 114, 405 S.C. 621, 2013 WL 5593748, 2013 S.C. LEXIS 270

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedOctober 9, 2013

DocketAppellate Case No. 2013-002140

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 749 S.E.2d 114 (In re Broome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Broome, 749 S.E.2d 114, 405 S.C. 621, 2013 WL 5593748, 2013 S.C. LEXIS 270 (S.C. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is hereby enjoined from taking any action regarding any trust, escrow, operating, and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain at any bank or other financial institution, including, but not limited to, making any withdrawal or transfer, or writing any check or other instrument on the account(s).

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI