In re Brooks

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Brooks

777 A.2d 298, 169 N.J. 221, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 947

DecidedJuly 6, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 777 A.2d 298 (In re Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brooks, 777 A.2d 298, 169 N.J. 221, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 947 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-183 concluding that FREDERIC H. BROOKS, formerly of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds), RPC 1.15(d) (failure to maintain required attorney trust and business account records), RPC 8.4(e) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) and R. 1:21— 6 (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FREDERIC H. BROOKS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-183 concluding that FREDERIC H. BROOKS, formerly of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds), RPC 1.15(d) (failure to maintain required attorney trust and business account records), RPC 8.4(e) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) and R. 1:21— 6 (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FREDERIC H. BROOKS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

777 A.2d 298, 169 N.J. 221, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brooks-nj-2001.