In re Brooks

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Brooks

725 A.2d 1123, 157 N.J. 640, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 274

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 25, 1999·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on November 6, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that FREDERIC H. BROOKS of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for multiple violations of RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FREDERIC H. BROOKS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[641] ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on November 6, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that FREDERIC H. BROOKS of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for multiple violations of RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FREDERIC H. BROOKS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[641] ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Brooks, 725 A.2d 1123, 157 N.J. 640, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 274 (N.J. 1999).

Pincite

725 A.2d 1123 (In re Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.