In re Brooks

Fourth Circuit

In re Brooks

585 F. App'x 117

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 27, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1566

StatusPublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 117 (In re Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brooks, 585 F. App'x 117 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glenn Brooks has filed a petition for an extraordinary writ. We have reviewed the petition and conclude that his request is without merit. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we deny Brooks’ petition for an extraordinary writ. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glenn Brooks has filed a petition for an extraordinary writ. We have reviewed the petition and conclude that his request is without merit. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we deny Brooks’ petition for an extraordinary writ. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 F. App'x 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brooks-ca4-2014.