In re Brooklyn Elevated Railroad

25 Misc. 120, 53 N.Y.S. 1087
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Misc. 120 (In re Brooklyn Elevated Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Brooklyn Elevated Railroad, 25 Misc. 120, 53 N.Y.S. 1087 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1898).

Opinion

Gaynor J.:

The property owners having failed to appear in the proceeding were not entitled to notice of any subsequent proceedings. A proceeding under the Condemnation Law to acquire title to real property is governed in that respect by the general rules applicable to actions and proceedings.. If there could be any doubt of this, it would be removed by reference to the said Law (secs. 3364, 3369, 3370).

There being no legal ground for opening the defaults, the motion must be denied for laches, especially as the awards in contested cases in the same locality were only for six cents.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Misc. 120, 53 N.Y.S. 1087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brooklyn-elevated-railroad-nysupct-1898.