In re Brooklyn Elevated Railroad
This text of 25 Misc. 120 (In re Brooklyn Elevated Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The property owners having failed to appear in the proceeding were not entitled to notice of any subsequent proceedings. A proceeding under the Condemnation Law to acquire title to real property is governed in that respect by the general rules applicable to actions and proceedings.. If there could be any doubt of this, it would be removed by reference to the said Law (secs. 3364, 3369, 3370).
There being no legal ground for opening the defaults, the motion must be denied for laches, especially as the awards in contested cases in the same locality were only for six cents.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 Misc. 120, 53 N.Y.S. 1087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brooklyn-elevated-railroad-nysupct-1898.