In re Brooklyn City Railroad
This text of 51 N.Y.S. 1139 (In re Brooklyn City Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This application is wholly informal. It should properly be made by petition, though we do not say that affidavits would not suffice if they contained all the necessary allegations entitling the applicant to the appointment of commissioners. The papers do not show that the Brooklyn City Railroad Company is a corporation, much less that it is a railroad corporation, incorporated under the laws of this state. If it is not such a corporation, it is not entitled to receive such a franchise. The. a are various other requirements by statute, with which the applicant must comply before it is entitled to maintain this application. The petition should be modeled somewhat after the form of that prescribed in condemnation proceedings. Application denied, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to renew.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 N.Y.S. 1139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brooklyn-city-railroad-nyappdiv-1898.