In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n in Respect of Scheinick
This text of 236 A.D. 680 (In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n in Respect of Scheinick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The attitude of the complainant indicates the truthfulness of respondent’s stofy with reference to the transaction between them. The attorney expresses regret for his inattention to the communication of the bar association. The charges are dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Carswell and Davis, JJ., dissent and vote to refer the matter to an official referee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brooklyn-bar-assn-in-respect-of-scheinick-nyappdiv-1931.