In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n in Respect of Rindone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n in Respect of Rindone

254 A.D. 562, 3 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6570

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 1938·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. There was an omission to state in the per curiam opinion that in the O’Connor matter there was proof that respondent had funds in his hands, received from his client, to pay the amount of settlement. [See 253 App. Div. 160,162.] Motion to suspend the enforcement of the order of disbarment granted and enforcement thereof suspended until May 1,1938. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. There was an omission to state in the per curiam opinion that in the O’Connor matter there was proof that respondent had funds in his hands, received from his client, to pay the amount of settlement. [See 253 App. Div. 160,162.] Motion to suspend the enforcement of the order of disbarment granted and enforcement thereof suspended until May 1,1938. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ.

In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n in Respect of Rindone, 254 A.D. 562, 3 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 562 (In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n in Respect of Rindone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related