In re Bronxville Bowling Club, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Bronxville Bowling Club, Inc.

263 A.D. 999, 33 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7831

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 A.D. 999 (In re Bronxville Bowling Club, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bronxville Bowling Club, Inc., 263 A.D. 999, 33 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Submission of controversy pursuant to sections 546-548 of the Civil Practice Act. Judgment directed in favor of the respondents, without costs. The relator’s property consists of a one-story brick building in which there have been installed fourteen bowling alleys. The question submitted is whether these bowling alleys are assessable as real property. Subdivision 6 of section 2 of article 1 of the Tax Law defines the terms “ land,” “ real estate ” and “ real property ” as used in the Tax Law as follows: “ The terms ‘ land,’ ‘ real estate,’ and ‘ real property,’ as used in this chapter, include the land itself * * *, all buildings and other articles and structures, substructures and superstructures, erected upon, under or above, or affixed to the same * * *.” It is conceded that the bowling alleys [1000]*1000are fastened to leveling strips laid upon stringers. These stringers are in turn laid upon but not fastened to a concrete foundation. The alleys might be removed by withdrawing nails and screws and cutting them into sections. Under such circumstances the bowling alleys are articles or structures erected upon or affixed to the land and are assessable as real property. (Matter of Standard Oil Co. of N. Y. v. Goldfogle, 255 App. Div. 1022; affd., 282 N. Y. 566; Matter of N. Y. Telephone Co. v. Ferris, 257 App. Div. 415; affd., 282 N. Y. 667; People ex rel. Herzog v. Miller, 258 App. Div. 724.) Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Adel, J. I dissent and vote to direct judgment in favor of the relator. In my opinion the bowling alleys are not assessable as real property within the purview of the Tax Law. While the manner of fixation of the alleys is not determinative of their character under the provisions of that law, bowling alleys not being specifically mentioned therein, they should be treated like other personal property. Therefore, there should be judgment for the relator in accordance with the terms of the stipulation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submission of controversy pursuant to sections 546-548 of the Civil Practice Act. Judgment directed in favor of the respondents, without costs. The relator’s property consists of a one-story brick building in which there have been installed fourteen bowling alleys. The question submitted is whether these bowling alleys are assessable as real property. Subdivision 6 of section 2 of article 1 of the Tax Law defines the terms “ land,” “ real estate ” and “ real property ” as used in the Tax Law as follows: “ The terms ‘ land,’ ‘ real estate,’ and ‘ real property,’ as used in this chapter, include the land itself * * *, all buildings and other articles and structures, substructures and superstructures, erected upon, under or above, or affixed to the same * * *.” It is conceded that the bowling alleys [1000]*1000are fastened to leveling strips laid upon stringers. These stringers are in turn laid upon but not fastened to a concrete foundation. The alleys might be removed by withdrawing nails and screws and cutting them into sections. Under such circumstances the bowling alleys are articles or structures erected upon or affixed to the land and are assessable as real property. (Matter of Standard Oil Co. of N. Y. v. Goldfogle, 255 App. Div. 1022; affd., 282 N. Y. 566; Matter of N. Y. Telephone Co. v. Ferris, 257 App. Div. 415; affd., 282 N. Y. 667; People ex rel. Herzog v. Miller, 258 App. Div. 724.) Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Adel, J. I dissent and vote to direct judgment in favor of the relator. In my opinion the bowling alleys are not assessable as real property within the purview of the Tax Law. While the manner of fixation of the alleys is not determinative of their character under the provisions of that law, bowling alleys not being specifically mentioned therein, they should be treated like other personal property. Therefore, there should be judgment for the relator in accordance with the terms of the stipulation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 999, 33 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bronxville-bowling-club-inc-nyappdiv-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack