In re Bronson

269 S.E.2d 27, 246 Ga. 136, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 993
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 2, 1980·No. Supreme Court Disciplinary Nos. 58, 35·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

After a hearing the Special Master and the State Disciplinary Board found the respondent in File No. 58 in violation of Standard 44 of Rule 4-102 of the State Bar of Georgia in that he had wilfully abandoned a legal matter entrusted to him.

In File No. 35 the respondent was found to be in violation of Standard 4 of Rule 4-102 in "that upon dismissal of the action he took absolutely no measures to notify his client that the dismissal had occurred,” and that he was also in violation of Standard 44 of Rule 4-102.

The State Disciplinary Board recommended in both instances that the respondent be given a public reprimand. The respondent has not filed any exceptions in this court to this recommendation.

After a review of the record we adopt the recommendation of the State Disciplinary Board. The Chairman of that Board is authorized and directed to prepare a public reprimand to be read in [137] open court by a judge of the superior court in the county of respondent’s residence and in respondent’s presence, pursuant to Rule 4-220 (a) of the State Bar of Georgia.

Decided July 2, 1980. Omer W. Franklin, Jr., General Counsel State Bar, Victor Alexander, Jr., Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. Arnold W. Wright, Jr., Kenneth O. Nix, for Bronson. All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bronson, 269 S.E.2d 27, 246 Ga. 136, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 993 (Ga. 1980).

269 S.E.2d 27 (In re Bronson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Matter of Sliz
273 S.E.2d 177 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)