In re Bronson

D.C. Circuit

In re Bronson

10 F.2d 1015, 56 App. D.C. 150, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2338

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 1926

DocketNo. 1820

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 F.2d 1015 (In re Bronson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bronson, 10 F.2d 1015, 56 App. D.C. 150, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2338 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, rejecting appellant’s application for a design patent for a dust cap for tire valves. The advance in the art claimed consists merely in the increase in the number of sides on the cap.

We agree with the holding of the Commissioner that this does not constitute invention, and in view of the numerous citations of existing patents, anticipating appellant’s device, the decision of the Assistant Commissioner is right, and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, rejecting appellant’s application for a design patent for a dust cap for tire valves. The advance in the art claimed consists merely in the increase in the number of sides on the cap.

We agree with the holding of the Commissioner that this does not constitute invention, and in view of the numerous citations of existing patents, anticipating appellant’s device, the decision of the Assistant Commissioner is right, and is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F.2d 1015, 56 App. D.C. 150, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bronson-cadc-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack