In re Bromley

E.D. Pennsylvania

In re Bromley

152 F. 493, 1907 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 334

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 28, 1907

DocketNo. 2,491

StatusPublished

This text of 152 F. 493 (In re Bromley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bromley, 152 F. 493, 1907 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 334 (E.D. Pa. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

HOLLAND, District Judge.

The petition of W. F. Bay. Stewart for leave to amend specifications of objection to the discharge of the bankrupt should be refused. The original specifications - were in the language of the act, and nothing more. There is no statement of fact on which an amendment can be grafted, and leave 'to amend should not be granted where only the words of the statute are used. In re Pierce (D. C.) 103 Fed. 64; In re Mudd (D. C.) 105 Fed. 348; In re Peck (D. C.) 120 Fed. 972.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOLLAND, District Judge.

The petition of W. F. Bay. Stewart for leave to amend specifications of objection to the discharge of the bankrupt should be refused. The original specifications - were in the language of the act, and nothing more. There is no statement of fact on which an amendment can be grafted, and leave 'to amend should not be granted where only the words of the statute are used. In re Pierce (D. C.) 103 Fed. 64; In re Mudd (D. C.) 105 Fed. 348; In re Peck (D. C.) 120 Fed. 972.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 F. 493, 1907 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bromley-paed-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack