In re Brodo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Brodo

608 A.2d 356, 128 N.J. 576, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1494

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 16, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS G. BRODO

of WAYNE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS G. BRODO is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

THOMAS G. BRODO

of WAYNE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS G. BRODO is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.

In re Brodo, 608 A.2d 356, 128 N.J. 576, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1494 (N.J. 1992).

Pincite

608 A.2d 356 (In re Brodo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related