In re Brock

North Dakota Supreme Court

In re Brock

28 P.3d 1017, 271 Kan. 1033, 2001 Kan. LEXIS 591

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 14, 2001

DocketNo. 85,672

StatusPublished

This text of 28 P.3d 1017 (In re Brock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brock, 28 P.3d 1017, 271 Kan. 1033, 2001 Kan. LEXIS 591 (N.D. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

On January 26, 2001, this court suspended the respondent, Rebecca D. Brock, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 1 year. See In re Brock, 270 Kan. 635, 17 P.3d 361 (2001). The suspension was made retroactive to January 1, 2000, when the respondent had voluntarily ceased to practice law. Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the costs of the disciplinary action and to resolve any CLE or attorney license fee problems.

The Disciplinary Administrator has filed a report verifying that the respondent has fully complied with the conditions imposed upon her by this court.

This court, having reviewed the files and the recommendation of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that respondent, Rebecca D. Brock, should be reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Kansas.

It Is Therefore Ordered that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Kansas as of the date of this order.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI