in Re Brittany Retledge and Arnold Lamotte, Jr.
This text of in Re Brittany Retledge and Arnold Lamotte, Jr. (in Re Brittany Retledge and Arnold Lamotte, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 23, 2019
No. 04-19-00341-CV No. 04-19-00342-CV
IN RE Brittany RETLEDGE and Arnold Lamotte, Jr.
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
On May 23, 2019, relators each filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the same underlying judgment. After considering the petitions, this court concludes relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petitions for writ of mandamus are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). This court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on May 23, 2019.
_________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of May, 2019.
___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CV04147, styled Brittany Retledge and Arnold LaMotte, Jr. v. Misty Santana, pending in the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable J. Frank Davis presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Brittany Retledge and Arnold Lamotte, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brittany-retledge-and-arnold-lamotte-jr-texapp-2019.