In re Brittany M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Brittany M.

25 A.D.3d 894, 806 N.Y.S.2d 440

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 2006·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Ulster County (Work, J.), entered December 28, 2004, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to extend the placement of respondent’s child.

The order of extension at issue has expired by its own terms, rendering this appeal moot (see Matter of Miguel HH., 285 AD2d 692, 692 [2001]). We therefore dismiss the appeal.

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Ulster County (Work, J.), entered December 28, 2004, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to extend the placement of respondent’s child.

The order of extension at issue has expired by its own terms, rendering this appeal moot (see Matter of Miguel HH., 285 AD2d 692, 692 [2001]). We therefore dismiss the appeal.

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

In re Brittany M., 25 A.D.3d 894, 806 N.Y.S.2d 440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

25 A.D.3d 894 (In re Brittany M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related