In re Brittany M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Brittany M.

25 A.D.3d 894, 806 N.Y.S.2d 440

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.3d 894 (In re Brittany M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brittany M., 25 A.D.3d 894, 806 N.Y.S.2d 440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Ulster County (Work, J.), entered December 28, 2004, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to extend the placement of respondent’s child.

The order of extension at issue has expired by its own terms, rendering this appeal moot (see Matter of Miguel HH., 285 AD2d 692, 692 [2001]). We therefore dismiss the appeal.

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Ulster County (Work, J.), entered December 28, 2004, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to extend the placement of respondent’s child.

The order of extension at issue has expired by its own terms, rendering this appeal moot (see Matter of Miguel HH., 285 AD2d 692, 692 [2001]). We therefore dismiss the appeal.

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.3d 894, 806 N.Y.S.2d 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brittany-m-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack