In re Brittain

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Brittain

213 So. 3d 1168, 2017 WL 1193212, 2017 La. LEXIS 640

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 29, 2017·No. NO. 2017-B-0493·Published

Opinion

[1169] ORDER

11 Considering the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension filed by respondent, John Arthur Brittain, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that John Arthur Brittain, Louisiana Bar Roll number 240B5, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.3, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1169] ORDER

11 Considering the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension filed by respondent, John Arthur Brittain, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that John Arthur Brittain, Louisiana Bar Roll number 240B5, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.3, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

In re Brittain, 213 So. 3d 1168, 2017 WL 1193212, 2017 La. LEXIS 640 (La. 2017).

Pincite

213 So. 3d 1168 (In re Brittain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.