In Re Bridges

709 S.E.2d 1, 289 Ga. 21, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 926, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 274
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 25, 2011
DocketS11Z0572
StatusPublished

This text of 709 S.E.2d 1 (In Re Bridges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Bridges, 709 S.E.2d 1, 289 Ga. 21, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 926, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 274 (Ga. 2011).

Opinion

Per curiam.

In 1993 this Court accepted Russell Thomas Bridges’s voluntary surrender of his license to practice law after he pled guilty in the Superior Court of Upson County to one count of manufacturing marijuana. In the Matter of Bridges, 263 Ga. 112 (429 SE2d 521) (1993). He was sentenced to ten years probation, with one year of intensive probation, plus a $5,000 fine, and 100 hours of community service. He was granted a full pardon on September 27, 2002.

In October 2009 Bridges filed with the Office of Bar Admissions an Application for Certification to Practice Law, which serves as an application for readmission. He also filed a statement of rehabilitation in accordance with In re Cason, 249 Ga. 806 (294 SE2d 520) (1982), to which he attached letters of personal reference supporting the application from 23 members of the Bar and from 37 community members. The State Bar did not oppose the application. The Board to Determine Fitness of Bar Applicants held a meeting in November 2010 after which it filed its report indicating its vote to grant certification of fitness for readmission, and it also filed the record of the proceedings with the Clerk of this Court so that the Court could make the final determination regarding Bridges’s certification of fitness as required by Part A, Section 10 (e) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law in Georgia, as revised on January 8, 2010 (the “Rules”). The Board has demonstrated compliance with the notice and confirmation requirements of Part A, Section 10 (d) of the Rules.

The record shows that since his conviction Bridges has shown remorse and has strived to act with integrity and responsibility through his hard work, his devotion to family, and as a volunteer in his community. As did the Board, we find the letters of personal reference to be persuasive, and we conclude that Bridges has shown that he is entitled to be certified as fit to practice law in Georgia. Further, it appears that Bridges has met all of the procedural requirements of Part A, Section 10 for approval of his application for certification of fitness. Accordingly, this Court hereby grants Bridges’s application for certification of fitness and orders that, upon satisfaction of all the requirements of Part B of the Rules, including taking and passing the Georgia Bar Examination and achieving a scaled score of 115 on the Multi-State Bar Examination, see Part B, Section 8, Bridges may be *22 reinstated as an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Georgia.

Decided March 25, 2011. Sarah E. Lockwood, for Office of Bar Admissions.

Certification of fitness for readmission granted.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Cason
294 S.E.2d 520 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)
In re Bridges
429 S.E.2d 521 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
709 S.E.2d 1, 289 Ga. 21, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 926, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bridges-ga-2011.