In re: Brian J. Benner

108 A.3d 1249, 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 25, 2015 WL 543030
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 2015·No. 14-BG-1168·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from the practice of *1250 law in the state of New Jersey, this court’s November 4, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Brian J. Benner is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010); In re Fuller, 980 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (re-buttable presumption of identical reeiprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Brian J. Benner, 108 A.3d 1249, 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 25, 2015 WL 543030 (D.C. 2015).

108 A.3d 1249 (In re: Brian J. Benner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)