In re Breslin

86 A.3d 129, 217 N.J. 217, 2014 WL 1282286, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 250
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 27, 2014·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-225, concluding that JAMES A. BRESLIN, JR. of LYNDHURST, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross ne-[218] gleet), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard trust funds), RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations); and RPC 8.1(b) and Rule l:20-3(g)(3) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES A. BRESLIN, JR. is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Breslin, 86 A.3d 129, 217 N.J. 217, 2014 WL 1282286, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 250 (N.J. 2014).

86 A.3d 129 (In re Breslin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.