In re Breslin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Breslin

86 A.3d 129, 217 N.J. 217, 2014 WL 1282286, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 250

DecidedMarch 27, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 86 A.3d 129 (In re Breslin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Breslin, 86 A.3d 129, 217 N.J. 217, 2014 WL 1282286, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 250 (N.J. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-225, concluding that JAMES A. BRESLIN, JR. of LYNDHURST, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross ne-[218]*218gleet), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard trust funds), RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations); and RPC 8.1(b) and Rule l:20-3(g)(3) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES A. BRESLIN, JR. is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-225, concluding that JAMES A. BRESLIN, JR. of LYNDHURST, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross ne-[218]*218gleet), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard trust funds), RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations); and RPC 8.1(b) and Rule l:20-3(g)(3) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES A. BRESLIN, JR. is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 A.3d 129, 217 N.J. 217, 2014 WL 1282286, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-breslin-nj-2014.