In re Brenner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Brenner

200 A.D.2d 850, 608 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 435

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 A.D.2d 850 (In re Brenner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brenner, 200 A.D.2d 850, 608 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 435 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Per Curiam.

By decision dated March 5, 1993, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of three months (see, Matter of Brenner, 191 AD2d 800). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicate that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of section 806.9 of the Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers (22 NYCRR 806.9) and has satisfactorily complied with the requirements of section 806.12 regarding reinstatement (22 NYCRR 806.12). Accordingly, respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Per Curiam.

By decision dated March 5, 1993, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of three months (see, Matter of Brenner, 191 AD2d 800). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicate that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of section 806.9 of the Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers (22 NYCRR 806.9) and has satisfactorily complied with the requirements of section 806.12 regarding reinstatement (22 NYCRR 806.12). Accordingly, respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 850, 608 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brenner-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack