in Re: Brenden F. Determann
This text of in Re: Brenden F. Determann (in Re: Brenden F. Determann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed July 18, 2013.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00902-CV
IN RE BRENDEN F. DETERMANN, Relator
On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 02-05622-R
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice O'Neill Relator contends the trial judge’s default order and judgment naming him as the father of
a child is void. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them
herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the
relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.
1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and
motion for emergency relief.
/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE
130902F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Brenden F. Determann, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brenden-f-determann-texapp-2013.