in Re: Brenden F. Determann

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 18, 2013·No. 05-13-00902-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY; and Opinion Filed July 18, 2013.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00902-CV

IN RE BRENDEN F. DETERMANN, Relator

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 02-05622-R

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice O'Neill Relator contends the trial judge’s default order and judgment naming him as the father of

a child is void. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them

herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the

relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.

1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

motion for emergency relief.

/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE

130902F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Brenden F. Determann, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re: Brenden F. Determann (in Re: Brenden F. Determann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)