in Re: Brenda L. Caddell

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 5, 2022·No. 05-22-00435-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed July 5, 2022

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00435-CV

IN RE BRENDA L. CADDELL, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-13738

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Reichek In her May 6, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus, relator Brenda Caddell

challenges the trial court’s (1) ruling sustaining the denial of her objection to the

visiting judge, and (2) refusal to reconsider the enforcement motion that the visiting

judge had denied. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the

trial court clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate appellate

remedy. In re Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding)

(citing In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding)). Based on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator

has failed to show an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ

of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE

220435F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Brenda L. Caddell, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re: Brenda L. Caddell (in Re: Brenda L. Caddell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)