in Re: Brenda L. Caddell
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed July 5, 2022
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00435-CV
IN RE BRENDA L. CADDELL, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-13738
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Reichek In her May 6, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus, relator Brenda Caddell
challenges the trial court’s (1) ruling sustaining the denial of her objection to the
visiting judge, and (2) refusal to reconsider the enforcement motion that the visiting
judge had denied. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the
trial court clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate appellate
remedy. In re Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding)
(citing In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding)). Based on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator
has failed to show an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ
of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
220435F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Brenda L. Caddell (in Re: Brenda L. Caddell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.