in Re: Brenda L. Caddell
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed July 5, 2022
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00435-CV
IN RE BRENDA L. CADDELL, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-13738
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Reichek In her May 6, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus, relator Brenda Caddell
challenges the trial court’s (1) ruling sustaining the denial of her objection to the visiting judge, and (2) refusal to reconsider the enforcement motion that the visiting judge had denied. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding) (citing In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)).
Based on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator has failed to show an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
/Amanda L. Reichek/
AMANDA L. REICHEK
JUSTICE
Schenck, J., dissenting. 220435F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Brenda L. Caddell (in Re: Brenda L. Caddell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.