In re Breland

789 S.E.2d 576, 417 S.C. 65, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 177
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 15, 2016·No. Appellate Case No. 2015-001819·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On September 4, 2013, the Court accepted an Agreement for Discipline by Consent entered into between petitioner and [66] the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and suspended petitioner from the practice of law for one year. In re Breland, 405 S.C. 573, 749 S.E.2d 299 (2013). In August 2015, petitioner filed a petition for reinstatement, which was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness. The Committee, following a hearing, issued a Report and Recommendation in which it recommends petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law. The petition for reinstatement is granted.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

s/Donald W. Beatty, J.

s/John W. Kittredge, J.

s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

s/John Cannon Few, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Breland, 789 S.E.2d 576, 417 S.C. 65, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 177 (S.C. 2016).

789 S.E.2d 576 (In re Breland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Breland
749 S.E.2d 299 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2013)