In re Breibart

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Breibart

727 S.E.2d 740, 398 S.C. 123, 2012 WL 2408730, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 122

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 1, 2012

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 727 S.E.2d 740 (In re Breibart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Breibart, 727 S.E.2d 740, 398 S.C. 123, 2012 WL 2408730, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 122 (S.C. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b) of [124]*124the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). The petition also seeks appointment of an attorney to protect the interests of respondent’s clients pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court. Pending further order of this Court, respondent is prohibited from accessing any trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and other law office accounts respondent may maintain.

The appointment of an attorney to protect the interests of respondent’s clients shall be made in a separate order.

/s/Costa M. Pleicones, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI