In re Bregman

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Bregman

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 530

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 30, 1958

DocketNo. 35482

StatusPublished

This text of 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 530 (In re Bregman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bregman, 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 530 (Ohio 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offenses with which he was charged and to which he pleaded guilty. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Tapt, Matthias, Bell and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offenses with which he was charged and to which he pleaded guilty. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Tapt, Matthias, Bell and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bregman-ohio-1958.