In Re Breckenridge

666 S.E.2d 260, 379 S.C. 205, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 250
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided August 25, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on July 14, 2008, for a period of thirty (30) days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

JEAN H. TOAL, CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Breckenridge, 666 S.E.2d 260, 379 S.C. 205, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 250 (S.C. 2008).

666 S.E.2d 260 (In Re Breckenridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Feldman
666 S.E.2d 260 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2008)