In re Braunhut

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Braunhut

259 A.D. 105, 18 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6056

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 105 (In re Braunhut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Braunhut, 259 A.D. 105, 18 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6056 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On January 5, 1940, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crimes of grand larceny, first and second degrees, which crimes are felonies.

Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, therefore, must be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On January 5, 1940, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crimes of grand larceny, first and second degrees, which crimes are felonies.

Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, therefore, must be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 105, 18 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-braunhut-nyappdiv-1940.