In re Braunhut

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Braunhut

259 A.D. 105, 18 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6056

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1940·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On January 5, 1940, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crimes of grand larceny, first and second degrees, which crimes are felonies.

Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, therefore, must be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On January 5, 1940, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crimes of grand larceny, first and second degrees, which crimes are felonies.

Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, therefore, must be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

In re Braunhut, 259 A.D. 105, 18 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6056 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 105 (In re Braunhut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.