In re Brass

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Brass

733 So. 2d 1183, 1999 La. LEXIS 1016, 1999 WL 202539

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 9, 1999·No. No. 99-B-0607·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

ORDER

After consideration of the petition for consent discipline, it is the decision of this court that the proposed consent discipline be rejected. Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20(A). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel is ordered to proceed with institution and prosecution of all disciplinary complaints pending against the respondent.

/s/ Catherine D. Kimball Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

TRAYLOR, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part II § 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

ORDER

After consideration of the petition for consent discipline, it is the decision of this court that the proposed consent discipline be rejected. Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20(A). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel is ordered to proceed with institution and prosecution of all disciplinary complaints pending against the respondent.

/s/ Catherine D. Kimball Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

TRAYLOR, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part II § 3.

In re Brass, 733 So. 2d 1183, 1999 La. LEXIS 1016, 1999 WL 202539 (La. 1999).

Pincite

733 So. 2d 1183 (In re Brass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related