In re Brantley
This text of 691 A.2d 817 (In re Brantley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on February 5, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that DAVID BRANT-LEY of VERONA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, should be reprimanded and required to practice under supervision for a period of three years for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) in his handling of an estate matter, and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that DAVID BRANTLEY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that DAVID BRANTLEY practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of three years and until further Order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 A.2d 817, 149 N.J. 21, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brantley-nj-1997.