In re Brantley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Brantley

669 A.2d 236, 143 N.J. 130, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 16

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 11, 1996·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Prior report: 139 N.J. 465, 655 A.2d 924.

[131] This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that DAVID BRANTLEY of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective May 1, 1995, by Order of this Court dated April 4, 1995, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID BRANTLEY practice under the supervision of an attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years, and until further Order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Prior report: 139 N.J. 465, 655 A.2d 924.

[131] This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that DAVID BRANTLEY of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective May 1, 1995, by Order of this Court dated April 4, 1995, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID BRANTLEY practice under the supervision of an attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years, and until further Order of the Court.

In re Brantley, 669 A.2d 236, 143 N.J. 130, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 16 (N.J. 1996).

Pincite

669 A.2d 236 (In re Brantley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related