in Re Branscomb P.C., Shannon Wilde, James Robichaux, Michael W. Stukenberg, James Clancy, Omar Leal, Keith Sieczkowski, Jeffrey S. Dickerson, Rhonda Jolley, and Grady Jolley
This text of in Re Branscomb P.C., Shannon Wilde, James Robichaux, Michael W. Stukenberg, James Clancy, Omar Leal, Keith Sieczkowski, Jeffrey S. Dickerson, Rhonda Jolley, and Grady Jolley (in Re Branscomb P.C., Shannon Wilde, James Robichaux, Michael W. Stukenberg, James Clancy, Omar Leal, Keith Sieczkowski, Jeffrey S. Dickerson, Rhonda Jolley, and Grady Jolley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-19-00387-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE BRANSCOMB P.C., SHANNON WILDE, JAMES ROBICHAUX, MICHAEL W. STUKENBERG, JAMES CLANCY, OMAR LEAL, KEITH SIECZKOWSKI, JEFFREY S. DICKERSON, RHONDA JOLLEY, AND GRADY JOLLEY
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa and Perkes Per Curiam Order
Relators Branscomb P.C., Shannon Wilde, James Robichaux, Michael W.
Stukenberg, James Clancy, Omar Leal, Keith Sieczkowski, Jeffrey S. Dickerson, Rhonda
Jolley, and Grady Jolley filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for
temporary relief and stay in the above cause on August 12, 2019. Through this original
proceeding, relators seek to compel the trial court to vacate its July 30, 2019 discovery order. By their emergency motion for temporary relief and stay, relators seek to stay all
trial court proceedings pending resolution of this original proceeding.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the emergency motion for
temporary relief and stay, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion
is GRANTED and the trial court proceedings are ordered STAYED pending further order
of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless
vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally
decided.”). The Court requests that the real party in interest, Kenton McDonald, or any
others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to
the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of
this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 13th day of August, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Branscomb P.C., Shannon Wilde, James Robichaux, Michael W. Stukenberg, James Clancy, Omar Leal, Keith Sieczkowski, Jeffrey S. Dickerson, Rhonda Jolley, and Grady Jolley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-branscomb-pc-shannon-wilde-james-robichaux-michael-w-texapp-2019.