In re Brandon

947 A.2d 626, 194 N.J. 562
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 20, 2008·Published

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-283, concluding that MARVIN BRANDON, formerly of BLOOMFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, should be censured for violating RPC 3.2 (failure to treat with courtesy and consideration all persons involved in the legal process) and RPC 5.3(b) (failure to supervise non-attorney employees);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a reprimand is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARVIN BRANDON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[563] ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brandon, 947 A.2d 626, 194 N.J. 562 (N.J. 2008).

947 A.2d 626 (In re Brandon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.