In re Brandon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Brandon

947 A.2d 626, 194 N.J. 562

DecidedMay 20, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 947 A.2d 626 (In re Brandon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brandon, 947 A.2d 626, 194 N.J. 562 (N.J. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-283, concluding that MARVIN BRANDON, formerly of BLOOMFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, should be censured for violating RPC 3.2 (failure to treat with courtesy and consideration all persons involved in the legal process) and RPC 5.3(b) (failure to supervise non-attorney employees);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a reprimand is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARVIN BRANDON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[563]*563ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI