in Re: Brandi Frazier

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 9, 2008
Docket13-08-00237-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Brandi Frazier (in Re: Brandi Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Brandi Frazier, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00237-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

IN RE BRANDI FRAZIER ____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Brandi Frazier, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on

April 3, 2006, asking this Court to compel the respondent, the Honorable Marisela Saldana,

Presiding Judge of the 148th District Court of Nueces County, to vacate a temporary order

signed on December 5, 2007. The Court requested and received a response from the real

party in interest, John Longoria, and one has been filed.2

1 See TEX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(d) ("W hen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); TEX . R. A PP . P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

2 Pursuant to order, the real party in intere s t ’ s response to the petition for writ of mandamus was originally due on May 9, 2008. The real party in interest filed a motion or extension of time to file his response until May 14, 2008, and the same was filed on May 14, 2008. The C o u rt herein GRANTS this motion for The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the response, is of the opinion that relator has not shown herself entitled to the relief

sought, and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 9th day of June, 2008.

extension of time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Brandi Frazier, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brandi-frazier-texapp-2008.