In re Bramhall

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Bramhall

667 S.E.2d 616, 284 Ga. 448, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3153, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 827

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 6, 2008

DocketS08Y1943

StatusPublished

This text of 667 S.E.2d 616 (In re Bramhall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bramhall, 667 S.E.2d 616, 284 Ga. 448, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3153, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 827 (Ga. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board which recommends that Respondent Richard A. Bramhall be disbarred pursuant to Rule 9.4 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d). This disciplinary action arises out of Bramhall’s having assented to the revocation of his law license in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a disciplinary sanction for his violation of his firm’s partnership agreement by failing to report or remit attorney fees.

Because Bramhall acknowledged service of the Notice of Reciprocal Discipline but did not object in any way, this Court hereby accepts the recommendation of the Review Panel and orders that Bramhall be disbarred. Bramhall is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Disbarred.

Ml the Justices concur. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jonathan W Hewett, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board which recommends that Respondent Richard A. Bramhall be disbarred pursuant to Rule 9.4 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d). This disciplinary action arises out of Bramhall’s having assented to the revocation of his law license in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a disciplinary sanction for his violation of his firm’s partnership agreement by failing to report or remit attorney fees.

Because Bramhall acknowledged service of the Notice of Reciprocal Discipline but did not object in any way, this Court hereby accepts the recommendation of the Review Panel and orders that Bramhall be disbarred. Bramhall is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Disbarred.

Ml the Justices concur. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jonathan W Hewett, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 S.E.2d 616, 284 Ga. 448, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3153, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bramhall-ga-2008.