In re Brady

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Brady

146 A.3d 644, 226 N.J. 587, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 951

DecidedSeptember 21, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 146 A.3d 644 (In re Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brady, 146 A.3d 644, 226 N.J. 587, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 951 (N.J. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-264, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule l:20-14(a)(4), MARK HENDERSON BRADY of MADEIRA BEACH, FLORIDA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded based on discipline imposed in the state of Colorado for unethical conduct that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of escrow funds), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK HENDERSON BRADY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[588]*588ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-264, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule l:20-14(a)(4), MARK HENDERSON BRADY of MADEIRA BEACH, FLORIDA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded based on discipline imposed in the state of Colorado for unethical conduct that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of escrow funds), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK HENDERSON BRADY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[588]*588ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 A.3d 644, 226 N.J. 587, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brady-nj-2016.