In re Bradshaw

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Bradshaw

188 So. 3d 252, 2016 La. LEXIS 720, 2016 WL 1175647

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 24, 2016·No. No. 2016-B-0356·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

|tThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter and failed to communicate with a client. Respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Charles Marvin Bradshaw, II, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26610, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

|tThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter and failed to communicate with a client. Respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Charles Marvin Bradshaw, II, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26610, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

In re Bradshaw, 188 So. 3d 252, 2016 La. LEXIS 720, 2016 WL 1175647 (La. 2016).

Pincite

188 So. 3d 252 (In re Bradshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.