in Re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 6, 2016·No. 03-15-00406-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00406-CV

In re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators have filed a motion to dismiss their petition for writ of mandamus. Relators

state that real party in interest CACH has nonsuited the Rule 202 proceeding from which

this proceeding originates and that the trial court has signed an order of nonsuit vacating its

June 12, 2015 contempt order and dismissing the case, rendering Relators’ mandamus petition moot.

Relators certify that they have conferred with real party in interest CACH and that it does not oppose

this motion. We grant the motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.1(a)(1).

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

Dismissed on Relators’ Motion

Filed: January 6, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

in Re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller (in Re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.