in Re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller
This text of in Re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller (in Re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00406-CV
In re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators have filed a motion to dismiss their petition for writ of mandamus. Relators
state that real party in interest CACH has nonsuited the Rule 202 proceeding from which
this proceeding originates and that the trial court has signed an order of nonsuit vacating its
June 12, 2015 contempt order and dismissing the case, rendering Relators’ mandamus petition moot.
Relators certify that they have conferred with real party in interest CACH and that it does not oppose
this motion. We grant the motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App.
P. 42.1(a)(1).
__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
Dismissed on Relators’ Motion
Filed: January 6, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brad-haskins-and-sue-miller-texapp-2016.