In Re Brackett

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In Re Brackett

991 A.2d 799, 2010 WL 1235761

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 1, 2010

Docket10-BG-49

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 991 A.2d 799 (In Re Brackett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Brackett, 991 A.2d 799, 2010 WL 1235761 (D.C. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order and opinion of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for 30 days, this court’s February 4, 2010, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response either to this court’s order to show cause or to the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Barbara L. Brackett, Esq., is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for 30 days as identical reciprocal discipline. See In re Powell, 836 A.2d 579 (D.C.2003). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as she files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order and opinion of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for 30 days, this court’s February 4, 2010, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response either to this court’s order to show cause or to the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Barbara L. Brackett, Esq., is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for 30 days as identical reciprocal discipline. See In re Powell, 836 A.2d 579 (D.C.2003). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as she files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

991 A.2d 799, 2010 WL 1235761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brackett-dc-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack