In Re Bpm

255 S.W.3d 531, 2008 WL 2420744
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Bpm. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 817
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 2008·No. ED 90410·Published

Opinion

255 S.W.3d 531 (2008)

In re B.P.M. & R.P.M., Minor Children.

No. ED 90410.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 17, 2008.

Christopher M. Braeske, St. Louis, MO, for Father R.P.D.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Gary Gardner, Jefferson City, MO, for Children's Division.

Before: KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant R.P.D. appeals from the order of the Family Court of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the Honorable Tom DePriest presiding. This order terminated the Appellant's parental rights to his minor children, B.P.M. and R.P.M.

Appellant raises three claims that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights. He argues 1) that there was insufficient clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support the findings made pursuant to § 211.447.4(2), 2) that there was insufficient clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support the findings made pursuant *532 to § 211.447.4(3), and 3) that the court's findings pursuant to § 211.447.6 were against the logic of the circumstances and an abuse of the court's discretion.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Bpm, 255 S.W.3d 531, 2008 WL 2420744 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

255 S.W.3d 531 (In Re Bpm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re B.P.M.
255 S.W.3d 531 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)