In re Boyd

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Boyd

572 A.2d 1159, 118 N.J. 550, 1989 N.J. LEXIS 1643

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 27, 1989·Published

Opinion

ORDER

BRIAN A. BOYD of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, having entered a plea of guilty to grand larceny in the second degree, in violation of section 155.40 of the New York Penal Law, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to R. l:20-6(b)(l), BRIAN A. BOYD is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that BRIAN A. BOYD be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that BRIAN A. BOYD comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

BRIAN A. BOYD of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, having entered a plea of guilty to grand larceny in the second degree, in violation of section 155.40 of the New York Penal Law, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to R. l:20-6(b)(l), BRIAN A. BOYD is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that BRIAN A. BOYD be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that BRIAN A. BOYD comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.

In re Boyd, 572 A.2d 1159, 118 N.J. 550, 1989 N.J. LEXIS 1643 (N.J. 1989).

Pincite

572 A.2d 1159 (In re Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.